So the  Iranians were so desperate to get rid of Khamenei (eventually, i.e. weakening him) and his henchmen that most of them gave their votes

to the ‘reformist movement’ candidate Hassan Rouhani. Since today, the 15th of June he has been elected as the new Iranian president. He managed within just a few weeks to knock out the favourites of Khamenei (i.e. a number of fundamentalists, as they call them). In the end of the day it’s all a farce of course, for the Taghoot Kafir and enemy of the Muslims and Islam, Khamenei, is the SUPREME leader of the country, and the president is some sort of puppet that they carry around the world to show that there are democratic election in Iran, for in real, Khamenei controls everyone, including the president.

The new elected president of the so called Islamic Republic of Iran, Hassan Rouhani (a quite dodgy person, we’ll get to that later on, Insha’Allah), or anyone else for that matter (all of them are approved by Khamenei beforehand) are only there to validate the existence of the Mullah ruled Iranian regime.

policymic.com:

Faced with the current dilemma, Khamenei was forced to “pick his poison” in deciding whether to share power with Rafsanjani and thus accept growing opposition within the regime and risk being seen as weak, or making a surgery and purge and risking the threat of radicalizing the opposition. Both present very serious challenges to his survival. The showdown may amount to political suicide for him, but more importantly may mark the beginning of the disintegration of the Iranian regime as a whole.

Similar infighting in 2009 resulted in candidates openly exposing each other’s crimes, and harshly condemning the past and present failures of the leadership, a spectacle which opened up a crucial window in which 30 years of grievances were aired by the public. The split in the leadership was utilized by the populations to voice their discontent with the regime as a whole, with the chants of “down with the Supreme Leader” becoming a rallying cry.

The once sacred post of the Supreme Leader has yet to recover from the de-legitimization of 2009, and Khamenei has continued to lose confidence by those desperate to keep the regime alive.

The present situation has once again validated the opinion of the people that elections in Iran are a meaningless farce, and that the overthrow of the regime remains the only viable alternative.

Indeed, nothing but a farce and the regime got what it wanted, i.e. the ‘approval of it’s existence by its people’. The Supreme Leader Khamenei himself makes it very simple, if you want to support the regime then you will vote and if you want to weaken the regime, then you will boycot. “What the enemy wants to see is empty polling stations, they want people to say ‘why should I vote?’ and people to think they can not make a difference, but those who want to see us strong will come and vote” Supreme Leader said during one of his recent speeches. Here some more shocking (as usual REAL Takfiri and extremists) statements of the palace scholars of the regime who tried to scare the hell out of the gullible ones to make sure they go to vote):

azarmehr.info blog:

The propaganda on Iranian State TV calling Iranians to go to the polling stations and vote on Friday is almost non-stop. Patriotic music, although any mention of Iranian nationalism is normally frowned upon as a non-Islamic thing, is unashamedly played throughout the election campaigns.

Hundreds of “passers by” are interviewed both inside and outside Iran by state TV, all without exception say its everyone’s patriotic duty to take part in the elections and “honour the martyrs of the revolution and the war with Iraq by voting”. State TV seems unable to find even one Iranian citizen who has decided to boycot this election farce.

Mashad’s Friday Prayer leader, Ayatollah Alamolhoda, told the faithful during his sermon last Friday, that “those who do not vote on the election day will definitely go to hell”.

Tehran’s Friday leader, the ghastly reactionary Ayatollah Ahamd Khatami also told his sermon goers that “under no circumstances should they stay at home on the election day” and he predicted that “with the help of God, we will witness a maximum participation by the people”.

Ayatollah Makrem Shirazi, the holocaust denier whose representative office in Harrow Road in London, received a grant from Brent Council for ‘promoting religious freedom and religious tolerance’ also said it is the religious duty to vote and “all should go to the ballot boxes on the election day even if they cast a blank vote!”
The most blatant confession that the regime is not that concerned about the vote count but is most keen on showing off pictures of long queues to the outside world.

Threatening their own gullible followers with the Hellfire in case they don’t go to vote. They play with the religion of Allah for their political agendas as if the religion is a game. They basically force the population to vote and if someone refuses to do so, the Hellfire is waiting for him. Why? All because of the man-made Shiite Republic of a bunch of Mullahs. We must remind you that this sort of extremism with the personality of Khamenei/the Supreme Leader has taken new levels of extremism, like in the following cases we wrote about:

Khamenei’s Police Chief Commander: ‘Not following Wilayat Al-Faqih is like adopting Salafism and makes ones blood persmissible to be shed’

Ayatollah’: “Disobeying the Wali Faqih (Taghoot Khamenei) equals Shirk!

Disbelieving in “Wilayah Al-Faqih” = Apostasy! Newest Rafidi-Super-Superstition

And lastly, here another Safavid of the Iranian regime who appeared on the state TV days ago arguing Iranians to vote on election day, so that Islamic Republic will remain a role model for other nations and they will wish they had an Islamic Republic too. He literally claims that the Iranian regime – that is hated so much in the recent year due to their crimes in Syria and interference in Sunni Muslim countries – is beloved and a role model for the Islamic Ummah. How delirious THEY ARE>>>.

As for him being dodgy:

His academic credentials have become subject of questions as it was said in his campaign film that he had studied in Caledonian in 1970s, several years before formal establishment of this university (with the merger of Glasgow Polytechnic and The Queen’s College, Glasgow in 1993), and his degrees ultimately awarded under the name “Hassan Feridon”, purportedly his family name before it was changed to Rouhani (Persian روحانی‎, which means “cleric”) with the 1979 Islamic Revolution.[18][19] A Glasgow Caledonian spokesman has stated the university was checking Mr Rouhani’s credentials but could not confirm them so far.

His family:

  عبد الله بن جعفر بن دَرَسْتَوَيْه الفارسي

 (258-347 هـ)

Abdallah bin Jafar bin Darastawayh (more correctly: دُرُسْتويه‌ Dorostavei) bin Al-Marzban Al-Farsi the Grammarian (proper classical persian name) – 258-347H

Ibn Darastawayh, Abu Mohammad, the Imam, the Allamah, the Shaykh of ‘Nahu’ (Arabic grammar) i.e. the Nahawi, he Lughawi (master of all sciences of the Arabic language), the Adeeb, born 285 after Hijri (i.e. in the pre-Safavid, Sunni Persia) in Fasa (فَسا), Persia (back than a city as big as Shiraz today) and was hence known as the Persian (Al-Farsi) and the Fasawi (from Faas). His name (Darastawayh/Dorostavei) is made of two words,

‘dorost’ (which means correct in Persian) and ‘awayh’/'aveyh’ (there are difference of opinions regarded the real meaning of this old-persian word, most say it means ‘scent’, and Allah knows best). His father himself was from the major Muhadditheen of his time and Ibn Darastawayh used to travel with his father for the sake of knowledge when he was around twelve years old.

Among those who narrated from him: Imam Al-Daaraqotni, Ibn Shaheen, Ibn Mandah, Ibn Ruzqawiyyah etc. Ibn Darastawayh compiled a number of books, among them:

- ‘Al-Irshad’ (about Arabic grammar)

- ‘Al-Hijaa”

- ‘Sharh Al-Faseeh’

- ‘Ghareeb Al-Hadeeth’

- ‘Adab Al-Kateb’

-’Al-Mathkoor wa Al-Mu’annath’

- ‘Al-Maqsood wa Al-Mamdood’

- ‘Al-Ma’aani fi Al-Qira’aat’

He was one of the top grammarians of the Arabic language in Basra (back then one of the main centres of Nahu/grammar) where many top grammarians graduated from.

قال الخطيب : في هذا نظر ؛ فإن جعفر بن درستويه من كبار المحدثين

Al-Khateeb (Al-Baghdadi) said in regards to him: ‘[...] Jafar Ibn Darastaway was from amongst the major Muhadditheen’.

As Ibn Khaldun suggests, it is a remarkable fact that with few exceptions, most Muslim scholars in the intellectual sciences have been non-Arabs (mainly Persians):

“Thus the founders of (Arabic) grammar were Sibawaih [Al-Shirazi] and after him, Al-Farsi and Az-Zajjaj. All of them were of Persian descent…they invented rules of (Arabic) grammar… great jurists were Persians*… only the Persians ['Ajams] engaged in the task of preserving knowledge and writing systematic scholarly works. Thus …

the truth of the statement of the prophet becomes apparent, ‘If learning were suspended in the highest parts of heaven the Persians would attain it“… [Sahih Muslim] [...]/

Source: Muqaddimah, Translated by Franz Rosenthal (III, pp. 311-15, 271-4 [Arabic]; R.N. Frye (p.91). 

There is loads about him in Arabic, here a Persian article:

ابومحمد عبدالله‌ بن‌ جعفر بن‌ درستويه‌ بن‌ مرزبان‌ فارسى‌ فَسَوي‌ 

Update: 24/05/2012 NEW working >>>WESALITV.INFO<<<

(NOTE: Your media player should be opening after having clicked on the link above. IF not, then try Internet Explorer. Also note that before the life stream starts, a Persian advertisment of the stream provider will appear, after that the live stream)

In a reflection of the polarizing effect of the political battles, Iran’s police chief, Gen. Esmaeil Ahmadi Moghaddam, was quoted this week by the official Islamic Republic News Agency as saying it was “permissible to spill the blood” of anyone opposing Iran’s system called “Velayat-e-faghih (Wilayat Al-Faqih),” loosely translated as rule of the clerics. The same news agency, which is under the control of Ahmadinejad’s administration, later denounced Moghaddam, saying he should “go back from where he came.”

Nothing suprising if you remember one of our previous articles:

‘Ayatollah’: “Disobeying the Wali Faqih (Taghoot Khamenei) equals Shirk!

But this time …

… imagine that, a Chief Commander of a whole country, a country where Sunnis make up the LARGEST minority, in such a country the Chief Commander of the Police says that following a non-Wilayat Al-Faqih form of Islam equals the following of Salafism and following Salafism is punished with the death penanlty in Iran. Sunnis don’t even believe in the fairy-tale of ‘Wilayah/Imamah’, let alone the hocus-pocus of ‘Wilayat Al-Faqih’ (a principle even disagreed by Shia scholars!). Ironically these very Shia scholars are the ones always complaining about ‘Extremist Takfeeris who deem Shia blood halal, blah, blah, blah …’. Khamenei the supreme heretical leader of Iran is at the forefront of (faking, practicing Taqiyyah) calling Sunnis to unite with Shias, yet we see how Allah exposes them and how they sometimes (the likes of the Police Chief Commander of IRAN, one of the highest authorities) speak out what they try to hide (Taqiyyah) in their blackened heart. It is also noteworthy that the Munafiq Khamenei and the Shia clergy are the first to call every group that opposes them, especially the Salafis as ‘Takfeeris’ (i.e. those who declare other Muslims as disbelievers). As you can see, the Rafidha just like the Khawarij were and are one of the most extreme Takfeeri group in the Islamic world, they always have been (for Allah’s sake, they declare the vast majority of the Prophet’s companions as apostates! Not even the Khawarij dared to say such thing).

DIRECT LINK>>

SCREEN SHOT:

Iran’s Police Chief Commander (!) Esmaeil Ahmadi Moghaddam: “One who follows Islam without Wilayat Al-Faqih adopts Salafism and thus his blood is permissible to be spilled”

and here the result of such exaggeration with the ‘scholars’:

اتَّخَذُواْ أَحْبَارَهُمْ وَرُهْبَانَهُمْ أَرْبَابًا مِّن دُونِ اللّهِ

They have set up their religious leaders and scholars as lords, instead of God. [Al-Tawba Verse No:31]

Chafiye (Persian style Ghutrah) by a blind-following Basiji reads: ‘As long as the Imam of the lovers (12th hidden Shia Messiah aka Dajjal) is in occultation, the obedience to Khamenei is obligatory.’

Here more Basijis longing for whatever Khamenei left from his impure backside (they seek Tabarruk/blessing from everything he touched, as if this Shaytan is holy or something):

MUST-READ:

Notable Hadith Scholars – Abu Hatim al-Razi - by  Sheikh Abdul Mohsin Bin Hamad Al-Abbad – Professor at the Faculty Of Shari’a, Islamic University of Madinah Al-Munawwarah.

Aqidah of the Salaf by Abu Zurah Ar-Razi (d. 264 H.)

The Creed of the Two Raazee Imaams – Aboo Zur’ah (d. 264 H.) and Aboo Haatim (d. 277 H.)

One of the most famous quotes of Abu Zur`a Al-Razi in regards to the Rafidha Shia:

of the Shia and suddenly the Salafis are Kafirs+Zionists although the Salafis according to every source be it Muslim or non-Muslims, made and make up a large number of the Islamic movements from Morocco till Indonesia, heck the Salafis (with many young charismatic leaders) are in the Egyptian parliament and many Salafi movements (not all) had a big part in supporting the revolutions against the tyrants who ruled over them, so in a nutshell, these very same Salafis are among the Muslims and the Revolutions that the Iranian regime shamelessly ascribes to itsef (as we reported here).

Here the Takfir of the wizard looking Ayadollar:

And we say:

Rawafidh (plural of Rafidhi) are neither Shiites (partisans) of Ali nor Sunnis (followers of the master of Ali, the Messenger of Allah), nor even Muslim, but Sabaite Zionists in every sense of the word.

The following post, a month old is really worth to linked by our page, but before reading it we’d like to remember our dear readers to the following article which proves the lunacy of the Shia Rafidha clergy and the Iranian regime who seriously believs that they are the representatives and supporters of the ‘oppressed’ in the world or even more ridicolous that there failed and polytheist and unjust and hijacked (by Mullahs, see here>>>) revolution and ideas (polytheist Shiism) will be imported to the world (particularly the Islamic world that never hated the Shia clergy and the Shia as it does today! Heck, Iranian Shia themselves leaving Shiism in DROVES>>>, particularly in south Iran>>>).

In old times, whenever the Rafidha clergy and the Iranian Shia state was attacked, the Mullahs could bring up the excuse that those who impose them are secularists and enemies of Islam, like whenever the Iranian embassies was being attacked around the world (a very common phenomena, since the Rafidi clergy has lost the trust of the majority of its own people), the Iranian regime was quick (and mostly right) to accuse secularists, MKO’s and other mostly Anti-Islam and nationalist iranian groups for those assaults. But since the crimes of the Iranian regime (thanks to their own satanic politics) have been exposed even to the most ignorant among the Islamic Ummah, the times of Iran being a role model, or Muslims looking up to Iran are certainly gone. Today the very youth who make up a major part of the religious community in most Arab (and non Arab countries like Indonesia, Malaysia) countries and in fact entered the parliaments (like in Egypt) are attacking the Iranian embassy and the Iranian regime and Shia clergy for their many crimes against Sunnis worldwide and the attacks on Sunni beliefs through Iranian promoted Shia temples, books etc.

Here more articles in regards to this topic:

Ayatollah Fadhlallah’s son: Iran wants to use all Shiites

Iran’s own Rasulullah caricatures! Everybody’s fed up with the Rafidi Republic, even Al-Azhar!

The American role in the Rafidite Safavids clergy’s Rise to Power

When the Rafidi Mullahs used to pledge allegiance and how they conspired their way to power.

Continue reading …

__________________

By: James Zogby

Policy discussions here in the U.S. about Iran and its nuclear program most often focus exclusively on Israeli concerns. Ignored are Arab and Muslim attitudes, especially those of Iran’s Arab and non-Arab Muslim neighbors. It is known that several Arab governments have problems with the Islamic Republic in Tehran, but what of their publics?

Over the past decade, we have been polling regional attitudes toward Iran and its policies culminating at the end of 2012 with a survey of 20,000 citizens in 17 Arab countries and three non-Arab Muslim countries (Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Pakistan). This 20 nation poll covered a range of topics including: attitudes toward Iran, its people, culture, and its nuclear program.

Comparing our most recent findings (compiled in my new eBook Looking at Iran: Iran’s Rise and Fall in Public Opinion) to the data from our earlier surveys in the region reveals important and dramatic changes in Arab and Muslim attitudes toward Iran. It also helps to identify factors that appear to serve as “drivers” behind these changes.

For example, when we polled on many of these same issues in 2006, Iran’s favorable ratings in Arab and Muslim countries were at their highest point. Back then, in most countries, Iran’s favorable ratings were in the 75 percent range (with Saudis giving Iran an 85 percent rating). Six years later the tables have turned. Now Iran’s favorable ratings in these same countries have fallen to less than 25 percent (Saudi ratings have plummeted to 15 percent).

in 2006, Iran’s favorable ratings in Arab and Muslim countries were at their highest point. Back then, in most countries, Iran’s favorable ratings were in the 75 percent range (with Saudis giving Iran an 85 percent rating). Six years later the tables have turned. Now Iran’s favorable ratings in these same countries have fallen to less than 25 percent (Saudi ratings have plummeted to 15 percent).

What emerges from our 2011 and 2012 polls is that the earlier favorable attitudes toward Iran were not about Iran, per se. Instead they appear to be more a reaction to Arab public opinion’s fury at Israel’s behavior and U.S. policies in Lebanon, Palestine, and Iraq, coupled with the perception that Iran and its allies were standing firm in opposition to the “machinations of the West.” What changed in 2012 is that the United States has lowered its regional profile, while Iran is perceived to be playing a divisive role in Iraq, Bahrain, Lebanon, and Syria.

What also emerges from our 2012 survey is the presence of a worrisome sectarian divide that has taken hold in several countries, with Sunni attitudes largely opposing Iran and its regional policies, and Shia communities in many of these same countries expressing support for Iran. There is a growing consensus among both Sunni and Shia Muslims that Iran and its policies are contributing to this sectarian rift. There is, however, a limit to Iran’s appeal in the Arab World and that is the result of the important role that Arab culture and identity play as unifying factors in shaping attitudes across sectarian lines.

There was a time, just a few years ago, when favorable Arab public opinion of Iran in some countries stood poles apart from the positions of their governments with respect to Iran and its policies. Some observers made much of this, suggesting that the concerns with Iran’s policies expressed by Arab governments were out of touch with their publics. That may have been true in 2006, but after Iran and its allies overplayed their hands in several countries (with Syria being the “nail in the coffin”–majorities in 17 of the 20 countries covered in our 2012 survey oppose Iran’s involvement in Syria), that gap has now been erased. Most Arabs and Muslims now hold decidedly negative views of Iran and are solidly opposed to Iran’s regional ambitions.

The same is true of Arab and Muslim attitudes toward Iran’s nuclear program. Back in 2006, when Iran was seen as the bastion of resistance to the West, their nuclear ambitions were supported and defended by majorities in most countries. Our earlier polls show Arab and Muslim public opinion supporting Iran’s claim that the program was for peaceful purposes. Whether peaceful or not, strong majorities in almost every country were opposed to any international effort to impose sanctions or use military means against the Islamic Republic. Today, there is virtually no support for Iran’s nuclear ambitions — with majorities now believing that Tehran has designs on producing a nuclear weapon. And sympathy for Iran has been replaced by widespread support for sanctions to stop Iran should it persist in advancing its nuclear program.

The lesson is clear. When Iran was seen in the Arab and Muslim Worlds through the prism of U.S. and Israelipractices, it won. But when Iran is judged by its regional behavior and its domestic repression, it loses support in Arab and Muslim public opinion.

Opposition to the use of military force remains high, with strong majorities still against it. But here too there has been a change, with some increase in the number of those who now support the use of a military strike should Iran persist with its nuclear program.

The lesson is clear. When Iran was seen in the Arab and Muslim Worlds through the prism of U.S. and Israeli practices, it won. But when Iran is judged by its regional behavior and its domestic repression, it loses support in Arab and Muslim public opinion.

*James Zogby is the President of Arab American Institute and author of ‘Arab Voices’

Huffington Post

‘I still recall what the Iranian secret service said vengefully to some of the imprisoned Muslim activists: “You are like the large room with large spotlights (the more eminent scholars) and smaller lights (the general scholars), and candles (the general activists); we will first extinguish the large spotlights.” This stage has been accomplished as they have killed most of the prominent scholars. “Then we will extinguish the smaller lights”; in this respect many activists have been killed and many others exiled. “Then we will turn the fan to put out the candles.” This is an indication of the final stage of forcing people into Shi’ism against their will.’

Recently the regime has arrested Molavi Fathi Mohammad Nakshbandi who is the Imam of the …

Friday prayer and Sunni scholar of Raask city located in Sarbaaz, province of Sisitan & Balochistan in Iran. He has been in jail since March of 2012, and reports state that the charges “have not been proven in a fair and official court” and it warns against highlighting sectarian divisions in Sistan-Baluchistan Province.  He along with  11 other Sunni activists are going to be executed.

He is going to be executed under the pretext of having assassinated (!) another other ‘Sunni’ scholar, the infamous Molavi Mostafa Jangi Zahei, an open stooge of the Iranian regime, a Basiji (!) who openly not just worked for the Shia government but even joined the paramilitary volunteer militia (Basij) of the Shia Mullah regime. Molavi Nakhshbandi under the usual unjust and brutal interrogation of the Iranian regime ‘confessed to his crime’, of course these forced confessions are worth nothing under no court whatsover let alone an Islamic one.

‘Sunni’ Basiji, Molavi Jang Zehi, one of the biggest Sunni stooges of the Iranian regime one of the HEADS of the Basij paramilitary of Balochestan!

These non-proven accusation that are usually thrown at Sunni activists to get rid of them. It is worthy to note that Molavi Fathi Nakhshbandi was a thorn in the regime’s eye for unlike other sell-out ‘Sunni’ scholars he was never ready to be a stooge of the regime, his religious centre too was a thorn in the Iranian regime’s throat since it did not comprise when it comes to traditional Sunni beliefs which are of course in contradiction to many Shia practices which are deemed heretical in traditional Islam (Sunnism).

The southeastern province of Sistan-Baluchistan has a large Sunni community, which has often voiced concern about the lack of state support for its needs.

The Zahedan Imam of Suunis, Molavi Abdul-Hamid, dismissed claims that the Sunni community is subversive. In a meeting with Sunni university students, Molavi Albolhamid said: “We do not ask for too much but we believe that in the 34 years since the Revolution, the Islamic system has had many opportunities to meet out justice and recognize the dignity of the Sunnis. And still some officials are asking for more time… until when?”

The Iranian Sunni channel ‘NOUR TV’ dedicated a number of shows in support of Molavi Nakhshbandi (in Farsi only):

We as Muslims do not decide who goes to paradise or hell, this is a misconception by many so called modernist Muslims and non-Muslims (Kuffar) alike. The one who ultimately decides who goes to Heaven and Hell is ONLY God (Allah) himself, all we know is that Paradise is certainly  forbidden for a polytheist soul, of course this does not mean that the Ummah (nation) of Prophet Muhamamd (peace be upon him), who are the true remaining Monotheists on earth will enter the paradise only, rather all the nations before the final Messenger will  enter the paradise too IF they died upon Monotheism. This is why Islam teaches that the TRUE followers of Moses, Jesus etc. will all enter Jannah, this is because all Prophets were Muslims and hence all Prophets taught the same core belief which is Tawheed (Monotheism). As for the Christians of today, they are all trinitarians, except a very few who although don’t hold trinitarian (heretical) beliefs, yet they reject the belief in the final Messenger Muhammad (peace be upon him) which is kufr (disbelief) in itself. Anyways, the point is …

… that Hugo Chavez lived and DIED as an Catholic. Catholics are arch-polytheists, they are actually worse than protestants, the latter ‘only’ worship the Christ only whilst the former worship the Christ, his Mothers, Angels and and endless list of (many, many …)  ’Saints’ (i.e. Priests aka Pedophile-swines etc.). We as Muslims are ordered to judge the people according to the outward reality, for we nor anyone else can see what is in the hearts, hence the Islamic ruling (which does not include conspiracy theories and other nonsense) is that Hugo Chavez died as a Christian-Catholic-Trinitarian about whom Allah says in the noble Qur’an:

“Surely, disbelievers are those who say, “Allah is the third of the three”  (trinity/worshipers of Christ) while there is no god but One God. If they do not desist from what they say, a painful punishment shall certainly befall such disbelievers.” (5:73)

Quran says: Whoever believes in pagan trinity is a pagan/disbeliever

Hugo Chavez says: Cancer Made Him ‘More Christian;’ Has Faith Christ Will Bring ‘Miracle’

Hugo Chavez also says:

Even if some might argue that he used to be Anti-Church, Anti-Missionary (note, both certainly doesn’t make one Anti-Christian), then there is ample evidence that Hugo Chavez in the last stage of his life made ‘repented’ and openly worshiped (!) Jesus the son of Mary (peace be upon them both):

Hugo Chavez: “Give me Your crown, Jesus,” the ailing autocrat proclaimed. “Give me Your cross, Your thorns so that I may bleed. But give me life, because I have more to do for this country and these people. Do not take me yet.”

Source

So these rock solid evidence should be kept in mind when ones being confronted with silly conspiracy theories of Pro-IRI Shias who love to defend the despotic Iranian regime and all their heresies to death (lately they claimed Chavez was a secret Shia, merely because he once visited the Shrine of the 8th Shia Imam in Iran. Acc. to this logic this the late Pope John must have been a Muslim+Hafidh of the Qur’an since he visited several Mosques and kissed the noble Qur’an!).

Now let’s see what the officials and representatives of the only Shia lead state in the world have to say, the judgement is with the reader, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, to see how far the Iranian regime is away from authentic Islam, for the sake of their political interests (their allies …) they praise whomever they like to the extent of declaring trinitarian polytheists as Saints.

1. Iran declared a day of national mourning [as if there is not enough mourning going on] on Wednesday after the death of Chavez, who shared the Islamic Republic’s loathing for what they both called U.S. imperialism.

2. In a condolence letter posted on his personal website on Wednesday, Ahmadinejad said he was certain that Chavez “will return” along with Jesus Christ and Imam Mahdi (the Rafidhi Shia version i.e. the hidden and caved 12th savior)

Ahmadinejad embarressed his followers to such a degree that some resorted to denial, simply deny and accuse the ‘west’ like here on the infamous Shiachat …

The embarrassing reality is the following though:

The above has been taken from Ahmadi’s offical website, we made the scan above, in case the Iranian authorities remove the link HERE.

Some kufri excerpts:

ترديد ندارم كه او بازخواهد گشت و به همراه همه صالحان و حضرت مسيح (ع) و تنها باقيمانده از نسل پاكان، انسان كامل، خواهد آمد و جامعه بشري را در استقرار صلح و عدالت كامل و مهرباني و كمال ياري خواهد كرد.

“I have no doubt that he (Chavez) will come back, along with the righteous and Hazrat Masih (AS), the heir to all pure offspring and perfect men (meaning Imam Mahdi), and will help bring peace, justice and perfection for all,”

او انساني عميقاً موحد و مؤمن و پايبند به ارزش هاي انساني و آسماني و باورمند به راه انبياء الهي و حاكميت جهاني عدالت و عشق به رهبري صالحان بود.

“He (Chavez) was a deeply monotheist and a believer and adhered to human and heavenly values and believed in the way of Prophets….”

In the closing of the letter he writes this:
دوست و برادر شما

رييس جمهوري اسلامي ايران

means;

Your friend and Brother

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

President of the Islamic republic of Iran

sonsofsunnah.com comment: Masha’Allah, isn’t it? Chavez who shortly before his death invoked Jesus (worshiped Jesus) and proclaimed more than once that he is a Christian (including the belief of worshiping Jesus i.e. a trinitarian) is a brother, ally of Mahdi, deeply monotheist and a believer but guess what Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman and the absolute majority of the Sahaba are to this Rafidhite president and the Shia …

As Muslims we are ordered to speak the truth and be just, hence we’d like to mention that some Shia clerics did spoke against Ahmadinejad’s remarks, but interestingly enough, most of those clerics are known to be from the conservative elements of the regime i.e. the pro-Khamenei camp. As it is well known, they have been some various clashes between Ahmadinejad’s camp and the hardliners (whom Ahmadinejad used to be part of in the past). As for major Shia scholars, like Ayatollah Ansari, they openly defend a polytheist like Hugo Chavez:

So in the end of the day, the president of the Shia state declared a trinitarian polytheist (who openly worshiped Jesus) a saint, their scholars say we can’t declare any disbeliever in Tawheed of Kufr as long as the disbeliever CLAIMS to be a Monotheist. We wonder if these heretics have ever read the Qur’an, the Qur’an that makes Takfeer of the Quraysh who CLAIMED to be not just monotheist, but on the path of Ibrahim. The Qur’an that makes Takfeer (declaring of disbelief) the trinitarian polytheist Christians who to this very day CLAIM to be ‘Monotheistic Trinitarians’! It is again the Qur’an against the Rafidhite Shiites. On top of all of that, after having heard so much defence and even praise for an open trinitarian socialist Kafir like Hugo Chavez, keep in mind that these Rawafidh Shiites are the same who will never look for excuses (let alone venerate …) the companions of the Final Messenger of God, the absolute majority of the Companions, especially the first Caliphs are disbelieving and impure thieves while a Socialist Kafir is a saint upon whose grave the Rafidhite president even bows down and kisses it.

Majlisi’s extreme hatred for the Sahaba >>>

Majlisi accuses the Mother of the Believer ‘Aaisha with all sorts of Kufr and slander >>>

According to al-Majlisi and al-Kulayni the sons of prostitutes have corrupted and changed the Quran >>>

(taken from the following article: The Reviver of Zorastrian (Majoosi) elements under the cover of Tashayyu’ (Shi’ism) – Majlisi )

Respecting the dead and their funeral is a human concept, the Final Messenger of Allah (peace be upon) him had been famously reported to have stood of for the funeral of a Jew, yet bowing down and kissing the coffin (even of a Muslim) is far away from the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah.

Hugo’s mother, Elena Frias and Ahmadi … 

As-Salamu ‘alayka ya Hugo Chavez (AJ) …

(Caricatures circulating the net, as we said the Iranian regime and its officials are a laughing stock, you can’t but mock them. Here you can see the new Saints of Shiism, Hajj Hugo Chavez (AJ) and Hajj Mesh Kim Jong il (Korea) … a disclaimer has been put that due to being new in the Saint-Business, no guarantee can be provided for healings/miracles in the case the new Shia saint Hajj Huga Chavez …)

As a side note, it is not the first time that the Iranian regime its clergy and its representatives proved that they are a laughing stock and the champions when it comes of innovating heresies:

Merci, brother Morsi!

Khomeini’s promises and the divorce rates of Iran – “Spiritual Greatness” at its best

Madame Tussauds – Rafidi version in Najaf!

Ayatollah Cardboard – New Rafidite Safavid superstition & extreme Idolatry

Another reality of the Pagan Republic of Iran – Idols of saints & “Ayatollahs”!